Bloom and Richardson developed a grading scheme for Infiltrating ductal carcinomas based on assessment of certain key histologic features - extent of tubule formation, nuclear pleomorphism and mitotic rate. A score is assigned for each of these measures, and then these are summated to give a total histologic score.
Extent of Tubule Formation
Growth Pattern |
Score |
---|---|
extensive tubule formation (> 75%) |
1 |
intermediate tubule formation (10-75%) |
2 |
little tubule formation (< 10%) |
3 |
Nuclear Pleomorphism
Nuclear Features |
Score |
---|---|
Nuclei small, regular and uniform |
1 |
Nuclei show moderate variation in size and shape |
2 |
Nuclei show extensive variation in size and shape, with large, abnormal forms |
3 |
Mitotic Count
The number of mitoses within 10 high-powered fields are counted and a score assigned. The count of the mitotic rate is greatly affected by the field of vision given by the objective. This must be taken into account when applying a score to the number of mitoses counted.
Field Diameter in mm |
Examples |
Mitotic Count Score = 1 |
Mitotic Count Score = 2 |
Mitotic Count Score = 3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
0.44 mm |
Nikon Labophot |
0-5 mitoses |
6-10 mitoses |
> 11 mitoses |
0.59 mm |
Leitz Ortholux |
0-9 mitoses |
10-19 mitoses |
> 20 mitoses |
0.63 mm |
Leitz Diaplan |
0-11 mitoses |
12-22 mitoses |
> 23 mitoses |
If the data in the table is plotted out, the following equations can approximate the break points for separating mitotic count score 1 from 2, and 2 from 3.
mitotic count score 1 if mitotic count <= ((122.81 * ((diam in mm)^2)) - (99.8 * (diam in mm) + 25.15)
mitotic count score 2 if mitotic count <= ((78.95 * ((diam in mm)^2)) - (21.32 * (diam in mm) + 4.09), and greater than the break point for score 1
Scoring
histologic score =
= (points for extent of tubule formation) + (points for nuclear pleomorphism)+ (points for mitotic rate)
Interpretation
• minimum score is 3
• maximum score is 9.
Histologic Score |
Grade |
Differentiation |
---|---|---|
3, 4 or 5 |
I |
well-differentiated |
6 or 7 |
II |
moderately differentiated |
8 or 9 |
III |
poorly differentiated |
Purpose: To histologically grade infiltrating ductal carcinoma using the Bloom and Richardson criteria.
Specialty: Hematology Oncology, Surgery, general, Obstetrics & Gynecology
Objective: laboratory tests, severity, prognosis, stage
ICD-10: C50,