Jeruss et al used a Clinical-Pathologic Scoring System (CPS) with additional tumor markers (CPS+EG) to evaluate outcomes in women with breast cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy. The authors are from University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.
Patient selection: absence of distant metastases (Stage IV)
Parameters:
(1) clinical stage
(2) pathologic stage
(3) estrogen receptor status (E)
(4) nuclear grade (G)
Parameter |
Finding |
Points |
---|---|---|
clinical stage |
I or IIA |
0 |
|
IIB or IIIA |
1 |
|
IIIB or IIIC |
2 |
pathologic stage |
0 or I |
0 |
|
IIA or IIB |
1 |
|
IIIA or IIIB |
1 |
|
IIIC |
2 |
estrogen receptor |
positive |
0 |
|
negative |
1 |
nuclear grade |
I or II (low or intermediate) |
0 |
|
III (high grade) |
1 |
total CPS score =
= SUM(points for clinical and pathologic staging)
total CPS+EG score =
= SUM(points for all of the parameters)
Interpretation:
• minimum score: 0
• maximum CPS score: 4
• maximum CPS+EG score: 6
• The higher the score the worse the survival.
CPS+EG Score |
5 Year Disease Specific Survival Rate |
---|---|
0 |
100% |
1 |
98% |
2 |
96% |
3 |
88% |
4 |
72% |
5 |
57% |
6 |
22% |
Purpose: To evaluate a woman with breast cancer using the Clinical-Pathologic Scoring System plus tumor markers (CPS+EG) of Jeruss et al.
Specialty: Hematology Oncology, Surgery, general, Obstetrics & Gynecology
Objective: severity, prognosis, stage, response to therapy, disease progression
ICD-10: C50,