Corley et al developed a decision rule for patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding based on data available at the time of initial presentation. This can help triage patients based on disease severity. The authors are from Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Harvard Medical School in Boston.
A good outcome was defined as all of the following:
(1) no evidence of persistent or recurrent rebleeding after initial stabilization
(2) not having an operation during the hospitalization
(3) being discharged alive
Parameters:
(1) initial hematocrit
(2) systolic blood pressure
(3) nasogastric lavage
(4) history of cirrhosis or ascites (evidence of portal hypertension)
(5) vomiting red blood
Parameter |
Finding |
Points |
---|---|---|
initial hematocrit |
>= 30% |
0 |
|
< 30% |
1 |
systolic blood pressure |
>= 100 mm Hg |
0 |
|
< 100 mm Hg |
1 |
nasogastric lavage |
red blood absent |
0 |
|
red blood present |
1 |
history of cirrhosis or ascites |
no |
0 |
|
yes |
1 |
vomited red blood |
no |
0 |
|
yes (hematemesis) |
1 |
total score =
= SUM(points for all 5 parameters)
Interpretation:
• minimum score: 0
• maximum score: 5
• The higher the score the higher the risk of adverse outcome.
• A patient with a score of 0 or 1 was classified as low risk for rebleeding.
• A patient with multiple risk factors was more likely to require endoscopic therapy to control the hemorrhage.
• The presence of comorbid conditions may increase the risk for complications.
Total Score |
Percent with Rebleeding |
---|---|
0 |
9% |
1 |
13% |
2 |
34% |
3 |
62% |
4 |
71% |
5 |
100% |
Purpose: To evaluate a patient with upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding for risk of adverse outcome using the decision rule of Corley et al.
Specialty: Gastroenterology
Objective: risk factors, severity, prognosis, stage, selection
ICD-10: I85.0, K25, K26, K29,