Description

Johner and Wruhs used functional criteria to evaluate a patient's outcome following a tibial shaft fracture. This can help identify a patient who may require additional therapy. The authors are from the Hopital Cantonal in Fribourg and University Clinic for Orthopaedic Surgery in Bern, Switzerland.


 

Parameter:

(1) nonunion

(2) osteitis

(3) amputation

(4) neurovascular disturbance

(5) varus or valgus deformity

(6) anteversion or recurvation

(7) rotational deformity

(8) shortening

(9) knee mobility

(10) ankle mobility

(11) subtalar joint mobility

(12) pain

(13) gait

(14) ability to participate in strenuous activities

Parameter

Finding

Outcome

nonunion

absent

excellent/good/fair

 

present

poor

osteitis

absent

excellent/good/fair

 

present

poor

amputation

absent

excellent/good/fair

 

present

poor

neurovascular disturbance

none

excellent

 

minimal

good

 

moderate

fair

 

severe

poor

varus or valgus deformity

none

excellent

 

2 - 5°

good

 

6 - 10°

fair

 

> 10°

poor

anteversion or recurvation

0 - 5°

excellent

 

6 - 10°

good

 

11 - 20°

fair

 

> 20°

poor

rotational deformity

0 - 5°

excellent

 

6 - 10°

good

 

11 - 20°

fair

 

> 20°

poor

shortening

0 - 5 mm

excellent

 

6 - 10 mm

good

 

11 - 20 mm

fair

 

> 20 mm

poor

knee mobility

normal

excellent

 

> 80%

good

 

75 - 80%

fair

 

< 75%

poor

ankle mobility

normal

excellent

 

> 75%

good

 

50 - 75%

fair

 

< 50%

poor

subtalar joint mobility

> 75%

excellent

 

50 - 75%

good

 

< 50%

fair

pain

none

excellent

 

occasional

good

 

moderate

fair

 

severe

poor

gait

normal

excellent/good

 

normal

good

 

insignificant limp

fair

 

significant limp

poor

ability to perform strenuous activities

possible

excellent

 

limited

good

 

To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.