Description

Wells et al developed a simple clinical model for identifying a patient who may have a pulmonary embolus (PE). The authors are from the University of Ottawa, McMaster University and Dalhousie University in Canada.


 

Parameters:

(1) clinical signs and symptoms of deep vein thrombosis

(2) alternative diagnosis

(3) heart rate (tachycardia)

(4) surgery or immobilization within past month

(5) history of deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolus

(6) hemoptysis

(7) history of malignant neoplasm

Parameter

Finding

Points

clinical signs/symptoms DVT

absent

0

 

present

3

alternative diagnosis

likely

0

 

unlikely

3

heart rate

<= 100 beats per minute

0

 

> 100 beats per minute

1.5

surgery or immobilization

absent

0

 

present

1.5

history of DVT or PE

absent

0

 

present

1.5

hemoptysis

absent

0

 

present

1

malignant neoplasm

absent

0

 

present

1

 

where:

• Signs and symptoms of deep vein thrombosis include leg swelling and pain on deep venous palpation.

• The presence of an alternative diagnosis would seem worthy of negative points.

• The malignant neoplasm should be significant and have a residual effect. Ideally it should be one associated with a hypercoagulable state.

 

total score =

= SUM(points for all 7 parameters)

 

Interpretation:

• minimum score: 0

• maximum score: 12.5

• The higher the score the greater the risk of a pulmonary embolism.

• A score <= 4 indicates that a PE is unlikely, while a score > 4 indicates that one is likely.

 


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.