McGurk et al listed criteria for deciding whether a minimally invasive method can be used to remove a salivary stone. The authors are from the Guy’s, King’s and St. Thomas’s Dental Institute in London.
Finding |
Exclusion |
Method of Choice |
stone not readily identified on ultrasonography |
ESWL (extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy) |
|
blood dyscrasia |
ESWL |
|
coagulopathy |
ESWL |
|
pregnancy |
ESWL |
|
history of stapedectomy or ossicular repair |
ESWL |
|
known fixed stone |
basket retrieval |
ESWL in parotid, intra-oral surgery if submandular |
located within a diverticulum |
basket retrieval |
|
diameter > 50% wider than the distal duct |
basket retrieval |
|
stone not palpable intra-orally |
intra-oral surgery |
|
If ESWL was attempted and if the stone persisted after 15,000 shock wave applications then an alternative method was chosen.
Specialty: Otolaryngology
ICD-10: ,