Description

Kelder et al reported a score for the diagnosis of congestive heart failure. The authors are from multiple institutions in The Netherlands and England.


Parameters:

(1) age in years

(2) myocardial infarct, CABG or PCI

(3) therapy with a loop diuretic

(4) displaced apex beat

(5) rales basal or more

(6) irregularly irregular pulse

(7) heart murmur suggestive of mitral regurgitation

(8) pulse rate in beats per minute

(9) elevated jugular venous pressure

(10) serum NT-proBNP in pg/mL

 

Parameter

Finding

Points

age in years

< 60 years

0

 

60 to 70 years

4

 

70 to 80 years

7

 

> 80 years

10

MI, CABG or PCI

no

0

 

yes

15

therapy with loop diuretic

no

0

 

yes

10

displaced apex beat

no

0

 

yes

20

rales

no

0

 

yes

14

irregularly irregular pulse

no

0

 

yes

11

heart murmur

no

0

 

yes

10

pulse rate

 

((heart rate) - 60) / 3

elevated jugular venous pressure

no

0

 

yes

12

NT-proBNP

< 100

0

 

100 to 200

8

 

200 to 400

16

 

400 to 800

24

 

800 to 1600

32

 

1600 to 3200

40

 

> 3200

48

 

total score =

= SUM(points for all 10 parameters)

 

Interpretation:

• minimum score: 0

• maximum score: around 196

• The higher the score the greater the risk of congestive heart failure.

 

X =

= (0.071646 * (score)) - 3.3812

 

probability of heart failure =

= 1 / (1 +EXP((-1)*X))

 

Performance:

• The area under the ROC curve is 0.85.


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.