Description

Zhao et al used the ratio of the number of diatoms in digested lung tissue to diatoms in the water where a person allegedly drowned. This can help to confirm or confute a diagnosis of drowning rather than postmortem immersion. The authors are from Guangzhou Forensic Science Institute and Key Laboratory of Forensic Pathology in Guangzhou, China.


 

Method Summary: tissue digestion, filtration, examination by scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

 

Samples:

(1) weighed sample of lung from within a lobe in grams (typically 2 gram)

(2) measured sample of water where the victim supposedly drowned in mL (typically 10 mL)

 

Method:

(1) The lung tissue was digested by heating the lung sample, 8 mL concentrated nitric acid and 2 mL of 30% hydrogen peroxide for 20 minutes in a microwave oven.

(2) The tissue fluid or environmental water sample were passed through filter membranes with a pore size of 0.45 microns.

(3) The number of diatoms were counted on the membranes by scanning electron microscopy.

 

number of diatoms in 10 grams of lung =

= (number of diatoms) * 10 / (weight of lung sample in grams)

 

number of diatoms in 10 mL of water =

= (number of diatoms) * 10 / (mL of water sample)

 

ratio of lung to water diatoms =

= (number of diatoms in 10 g lung tissue) / (number of diatoms in 10 mL water)

 

Interpretation:

• A ratio > 2 had a specificity of 100% for drowning with exclusion of postmortem immersion group.

• A ratio > 1 had a specificity of 96%. The maximum ratio for postmortem immersion was 1.26.

• A ratio > 1 had a sensitivity of 91% for drowning, meaning that 9% of drowned victims will have a lower ratio.

• The ratio in drowning victims was 0.02 to 64.7, so that a low ratio does not exclude drowning.

 


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.