Description

Pautier et al reported prognostic factors for uterine sarcomas. These can help to identify a patient who may benefit from more aggressive management. The authors are from Institut Gustave Roussy in France.


 

Types of uterine sarcomas diagnosed:

(1) leiomyosarcoma

(2) malignant mixed Mullerian tumor (MMMT)

(3) endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS)

 

Low-grade endometrial sarcoma tended to have a good prognosis, while all of the other types were unfavorable.

 

Stages used:

(1) Stage I: uterus

(2) Stage II: uterus and cervix

(3) Stage III: confined to pelvis

(4) Stage IV: extrapelvic disease

 

Poor prognostic features for a uterine leiomyosarcoma:

(1) Stage III or IV

(2) mitotic count between 10 and 20 mitoses in 10 high power fields (x400)

 

where:

• A mitotic count > 20 per 10 hpf was associated with a better prognosis, possibly because patients were treated more aggressively and received adjuvant therapy.

 

Poor prognostic features for a malignant mixed Mullerian tumor (MMMT):

(1) higher stage (not defined, possibly Stage II or higher (see note)

(2) age > 60 years

 

Poor prognostic features for an endometrial stromal sarcoma:

(1) mitotic count > 10 mitoses in 10 high power fields (indicating high grade disease)

(2) higher stage (not defined, possibly Stage II or higher (see note)

(3) age > 50 years

 

where:

• The cutoff for stage for MMMT and ESS were not stated. According to page 1429, column 1, prognosis was better for Stage I vs other stages.

 


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.