Okada et al identified pathologic factors associated with prognosis in patients with gastric carcinoma extending into or through the muscularis propria. This can help identify patients who may benefit from more aggressive therapy. The authors are from Kyushu and Fukuoka Universities in Japan.
Exclusion criteria:
(1) positive surgical margins of resection
(2) invasion of esophagus
(3) no invasion of muscularis propria (prognosis for musosal or submucosal involvement is considered excellent)
Parameters associated with prognosis:
(1) depth of penetration
(2) duodenal invasion
(3) macroscopic appearance
(4) INF pattern
(5) lymphatic or vascular invasion
(6) fibrosis accompanying cancer
Factor |
Favorable |
Intermediate |
Unfavorable |
depth of penetration |
muscularis propria or subserosa |
NA |
serosa |
duodenal invasion |
absent |
NA |
present |
macroscopic appearance |
advanced cancer simulating early cancer |
Borrmann type I or II |
Borrmann type III or IV |
INF |
alpha pattern |
beta pattern |
gamma pattern |
lymphatic or vascular invasion |
absent |
NA |
present |
fibrosis accompanying cancer |
abundant |
some |
absent |
where:
• Borrmann type refers to the macroscopic appearance of the tumor based on examination of the mucosal surface, as described in the next section.
• I am not sure of the exact meaning of INF, but I assume it refers to the infiltrative pattern of tumor growth. The alpha pattern has an expansive growth pattern with a distinct border from the surrounding tissue. The gamma pattern has an infiltrative growth pattern with an ill-defined, indistinct border. The beta pattern is intermediate between the alpha and gamma patterns.
Interpretation:
• The more favorable factors the better for prognosis.
Limitations:
• I did not see status of lymph nodes mentioned.
• No mention was made of distant metastasis, but I assume these would all have a poor prognosis.
Specialty: Hematology Oncology, Surgery, general, Gastroenterology
ICD-10: ,