Chandrasinghe et al reported a number of factors associated with survival in a patient with rectal carcinoma. These can help to identify a patient who may benefit from more aggressive management. The authors are from North Colombo Teaching Hospital I Ragama, Sri Lanka.
Patient selection: rectal cancer
Outcome: overall survival
Parameters identified on multivariate analysis:
(1) pre-operative serum albumin
(2) circumferential margin status
(3) pathologic stage
Parameter |
Finding |
Points |
pre-operative serum albumin |
>= 35 g/L |
0 |
|
< 35 g/L |
1 |
circumferential margin |
negative for tumor |
0 |
|
positive for tumor |
1 |
pathologic stage |
Stage I or II |
0 |
|
Stage III or IV |
1 |
where:
• The hazard ratio for each factor was around 2.
total number of key risk factors =
= SUM(points for all 3 parameters)
Additional factors associated with a worse survival:
(1) older age
(2) perineural invasion
(3) lymphovascular invasio
(4) angioinvasion
Interpretation:
• minimum number of key risk factors: 0
• maximum number of key risk factors: 3
• The greater the number of key risk factors the worse the overall survival.
Specialty: Hematology Oncology, Surgery, general, Gastroenterology
ICD-10: ,