Interpreting a Congo red stain for amyloid can be challenging. A number of pitfalls need to be avoided.
Finding |
Pitfall |
Amyloid can be focal and/or limited in a biopsy, making a false negative result possible. |
The clinician assumes that a negative Congo red stain excludes amyloidosis. |
Amyloid can be focal and/or limited in a biopsy. |
Failure to completely and carefully examine the entire slide. |
Detection of amyloid in a Congo red stained slide requires a polarized microscope. |
Use of a standard clinical microscope rather than a metallurgical microscope. |
Plastic cover slips may interfere with the ability to perform a crossed polarized light examination. |
Using plastic cover slip instead of glass. |
Collagen and other matrix proteins may have a blue-green hue that can result in a false positive interpretation. |
Using a polarizing filter with built-in compensator. |
Sensitivity can be increased in borderline cases by use of polar mounting media or omitting the alcohol differentiation step. |
Failure to detect small amounts of amyloid because processing or staining has not been optimized. |
Amyloid can be detected by additional tests such as electron microscopy. |
Failure to perform specialized tests in a borderline case. |
Optimum microscope for detection of amyloid:
(1) metallurgical polarized microscope
(2) strain free optics
(3) matching polarizers
(4) dis-integrated compensators
(5) circular mobile stage
Specialty: Clinical Laboratory