Potting et al reported a scoring system for oral mucositis in cancer patients. This can help nurses monitor a patient over time. The authors are from Radboud University at Nijmegen Medical Center in the Netherlands.
Patient selection: cancer patient at risk for oral mucositis
Objective parameters based on mouth inspection:
(1) erythema
(2) edema
(3) lesions
Subjective parameters from patient:
(1) pain based on VAS scale
(2) dryness of mouth
(3) viscosity of saliva
Parameter |
Finding |
Points |
erythema |
pink and moist |
0 |
|
mild to moderate |
1 |
|
severe |
2 |
edema |
none |
0 |
|
mild (print of teeth in tongue edge; gingiva swollen and red |
1 |
|
moderate (print of teeth in tongue; gingiva swollen and white) |
2 |
|
severe (tongue and gingiva swollen, gingiva white) |
3 |
lesions |
none |
0 |
|
1 to 4 |
1 |
|
5 or more |
2 |
|
elapse ulceration |
3 |
pain |
none (0 on VAS) |
0 |
|
0.1 to 3 on VAS |
1 |
|
4 to 6 on VAS |
2 |
|
> 6 on VAS |
3 |
dryness of mouth |
normal |
0 |
|
mild dryness |
1 |
|
moderate dryness |
2 |
|
severe dryness |
3 |
viscosity of saliva |
normal |
0 |
|
slimy |
1 |
|
thick |
2 |
where:
• A pain VAS between 3 and 4 is uncovered. This will be incorporated with 4 in the implementation.
total score =
= SUM(points for all 6 parameters)
Interpretation:
• minimum score: 0
• maximum score: 16
• The higher the score the more severe the mucositis.
Performance:
• Erythema and edema were the items with the lowest inter-observer reliability (kappa 0.6 and 0.26 respecitvely).
• The inter-observer reliability for the other 4 items range from 0.72 to 0.83 which is good to very good.
Specialty: Hematology Oncology, Otolaryngology