Ben-David et al reported a minimally invasive treatment algorithm to manage a patient with an esophageal perforation. An esophageal perforation can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality if not treated appropriately. The authors are from the University of Florida at Gainseville and Roswell Park Cancer Center in Buffalo.
Patient selection: esophageal perforation (iatrogenic, spontaneous, other)
Diagnosis: CT of chest and abdomen with water-soluble contrast
Most perforations occur in the distal esophagus (90%).
Parameters:
(1) location of perforation
(2) contained vs uncontained
(3) number of hours since event
Location |
Containment |
Number of Hours |
Intervention |
esophagus |
yes |
NA |
1 |
esophagus |
no |
NA |
2 |
abdomen |
NA |
< 24 hours |
3 |
abdomen |
NA |
>= 24 hours |
4 |
Intervention 1:
(1) nil per os (NPO)
(2) intravenous antibiotics
(3) chest drainage if needed
Intervention 2:
(1) placement of esophageal stent
(2) drainage if needed (laparoscopic or thoracoscopic)
(3) laparoscopic feeding tube (gastrostomy, jejunostomy)
Intervention 3:
(1) placement of esophageal stent
(2) minimally invasive repair with or without gastric wrap
(3) laparoscopic jejunostomy feeding tube
Intervention 4:
(1) placement of esophageal stent
(2) laparoscopic drainage
(3) laparoscopic jejunostomy feeding tube
One third of patients had prolonged intubation and pneumonia.
Specialty: Gastroenterology