From the position of the infant on the Liley plot, it was possible to predict the degree of affliction of the newborn infant.
Lines to Define the Liley Plot
Lines |
y at 28 weeks |
y at 40 weeks |
? log (100*absorbance) |
---|---|---|---|
IIIA - IIIB |
0.50 |
0.168 |
-0.46 |
IIB - IIIA |
0.23 |
0.083 |
-0.44 |
IIA - IIB |
0.12 |
0.04 |
-0.48 |
I - IIA |
0.056 |
0.019 |
-0.45 |
where:
• IIIB is most severely affected and I is least.
• The absorbance at 40 weeks is about one third of the value at 28 weeks.
• The value for y at 40 weeks on line I-IIA was given as 0.30, which is obviously wrong.
Mean slope of lines: -0.039
LOG10 (100 * (absorbance)) =
= ((-0.039) * (weeks gestation)) + B
absorbance =
= (10 ^ (((-0.039) * (weeks gestation)) + B)) / 100
where:
• B for IIIA-IIIB = 2.78
• B for IIB-IIIA = 2.45
• B for IIA-IIB = 2.17
• B for I-IIA = 1.84
|
|
Percent in each cohort with a given cord hemoglobin |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zone |
Week |
un-affected |
Cord Hgb > 14 |
Cord Hgb 11 - 13.9 |
Cord Hgb 8 - 10.9 |
Cord Hgb < 8, stillborn |
I |
28 - 31 |
56 |
38 |
6 |
|
|
|
31 - 34 |
52 |
19 |
29 |
|
|
|
34 - 37 |
36 |
40 |
21 |
3 |
|
|
37 - 40 |
33 |
49 |
18 |
|
|
IIA |
28 - 31 |
25 |
29 |
28 |
8 |
10 |
|
31 - 34 |
24 |
37 |
30 |
9 |
|
|
34 - 37 |
14 |
42 |
34 |
8 |
2 |
|
37 - 40 |
18 |
41 |
35 |
6 |
|
IIB |
28 - 31 |
8 |
20 |
23 |
21 |
28 |
|
31 - 34 |
6 |
9 |
19 |
44 |
22 |
|
34 - 37 |
|
10 |
35 |
45 |
10 |
|
37 - 40 |
|
|
|
|
|
IIIA |
28 - 31 |
|
|
|
12 |
88 |
|
31 - 34 |
|
|
7 |
29 |
64 |
|
34 - 37 |
|
|
|
44 |
56 |
|
37 - 40 |
|
|
|
|
|
IIIB |
28 - 31 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
31 - 34 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
34 - 37 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
37 - 40 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
Specialty: Obstetrics & Gynecology, Clinical Laboratory
ICD-10: ,