Description

Powell et al identified conditions where resuscitative thoracotomy in the Emergency Department is futile. This can prevent unnecessary therapy for patients with no hope of recovery. The authors are from Denver Health Medical Center and the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center.


 

Parameters:

(1) type of injury (blunt vs penetrating)

(2) duration of CPR in minutes

(3) signs of life (pupillary response, respiratory effort, or motor activity)

(4) asystole documented on cardiac monitoring

(5) cardiac tamponade

 

Contraindications to resuscitative thoracotomy:

(1) blunt trauma AND CPR > 5 minutes AND no signs of life

(2) blunt trauma AND asystole

(3) penetrating trauma AND CPR > 15 minutes AND no signs of life

(4) penetrating trauma AND asystole AND no cardiac tamponade

 

Indications for resuscitative thoracotomy:

(1) blunt trauma AND CPR <= 5 minutes

(2) blunt trauma AND CPR > 5 minutes AND signs of life

(3) penetrating trauma AND CPR <= 15 minutes

(4) penetrating trauma AND CPR > 15 minutes AND signs of life

(5) penetrating trauma AND asystole AND cardiac tamponade

 

where:

• In theory a patient can have both blunt and penetrating trauma. For the implementation I will assume that any penetrating injury will classify the patient as having had penetrating trauma.

 


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.