Description

Cervantes et al were able to separate patients with idiopathic myelofibrosis into good and poor prognostic groups based on 4 risk factors. The study was done at the Hospital Clinic in Barcelona, Spain.


 

Parameters:

(1) age

(2) constitutional symptoms

(3) hemoglobin

(4) circulating blasts

 

Parameter

Finding

Points

age

<= 64

0

 

> 64

1

constitutional symptoms

absent

0

 

present

1

hemoglobin

>= 10 g/dL

0

 

< 10 g/dL

1

circulating blasts

absent

0

 

present

1

 

where:

• Constitutional symptoms = fever, night sweats, and/or weight loss (B symptoms for malignant lymphoma)

 

score =

= SUM(points for all 4 factors)

 

Interpretation:

• minimum score: 0

• maximum score: 4

• Survival decreases as the number of risk factors increase.

 

Score

Median Survival in Months

95% Confidence Interval

0

130.1 months

76.0 - (uncertain)

1

68.7 months

47.4 - 98.9

2

21.5 months

13.3 - 32.4

3

10.0 months

6.0 - 20.1

 

Since the 95% confidence intervals for patients with 0-1 and 2-3 risk factors overlap, they combined these groups into low and high risk groups.

Score

Risk Group

Median Survival in Months

95% Confidence Interval

0 or 1

low

98.8 months

68.7 - 127.6

2, 3 or 4

high

20.6 months

10 - 28.2

 

While Visani et al (1990) and Dupriez et al (1996) tried to divide patients into 3 prognostic groups, Cervantes feels that the survival curves of the intermediate and high risk groups overlap and that these should be combined into a single poor survival group.

 


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.