Flanagan et al used standard histologic findings to predict a woman’s Oncotype™ recurrence score. The authors are from Magee-Women’s Hospital and University of Pittsburgh.
Patient selection: woman with invasive breast cancer (types not specified), ideally lymph node negative and ER-positive
Paramters:
(1) nuclear grade
(2) mitotic count in 10 high power fields with 0.55 mm high power field diameter (Nikon eclipse 50i scope) or 0.238 square mm
(3) H score for estrogen receptor (from 0 to 300)
(4) H score for progesterone receptor (from 0 to 300)
(5) HER2/neu status
H score =
= (percent of cells staining 1+) + (2 * (percent of cells staining 2+)) + (3 * (percent of cells staining 3+))
Parameter |
Finding |
Points |
nuclear grade |
well-differentiated |
1 |
|
moderately differentiated |
2 |
|
poorly differenitated |
3 |
mitotic count in 10 hpf |
<= 8 |
1 |
|
9 to 18 |
2 |
|
>= 19 |
3 |
HER2/neu |
negative |
0 |
|
equivocal |
0 |
|
positive (amplified) |
1 |
where:
• The cutoffs for the mitotic count would need to be adjusted for different field areas at high power.
estimated recurrence score =
= (5.538 * (points for mitotic count)) + (9.486 * (points for HER2 status)) + (5.42 * (points for nuclear grade)) – (0.045 * (H score for ER)) – (0.03 * (H score for PR)) + 13.424
Recurrence Score |
Risk of Recurrence |
<= 17 |
low |
18 to 30 |
intermediate |
>= 31 |
high |
Performance:
• The approximated score performed well for Nottingham Grade 1 and 3 tumors. The Oncotype™ score may be helpful in Nottingham Grade 2 or equivocal tumors.
Specialty: Hematology Oncology, Surgery, general, Obstetrics & Gynecology
ICD-10: ,