In addition to asking an author to grade the reviewer's comments (see previous section), feedback on how well the editor have performed can be elicited. Editors from some information sources can be a pain.
Questions:
(1) submission demands
(2) revision demands
(3) timeliness of responses
(4) attitude towards new ideas
(5) professionalism
(6) selection and handling of reviewers
(7) final decision
(8) likelihood of submitting to the journal again
In addition the authors can give a Likert-scale global assessment of working with the editor:
Global Assessment
Score
bad
1
suboptimal
2
fair
3
good
4
exceptional
5
To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.
