Description

Hutcheson et al evaluated the ability of a patient to swallow after cancer therapy using the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST). This can help to identify a patient at risk for serious complications over time. The authors are from multiple institutions in the United States and England.


Subscales:

(1) efficiency of swallowing

(2) safety of swallowing

 

Types of test bolus:

(1) cracker or cooking

(2) pudding

(3) water

 

Grades of swallowing difficulty:

(0) none

(1) mild

(2) moderate

(3) severe

(4) life-threatening

 

Maximum Percent of Pharyngeal Residue

Efficiency Level

< 10%

1

10 to 49%

2

50 to 90%

3

> 90%

4

 

 

Efficiency Levels for All 3 Tests

Efficiency Grade

all level 1

0

any level 2, none 3 or 4

1

cracker/cookie level 3, other <= 2

2

liquid and/or pudding level 3, cracker or cookie level <= 3

3

one or two tests level 4

3

all tests level 4

4

 

The aspiration level is determined for each test bolus.

 

Status

Safety Level

neither penetration nor aspiration

0

silent penetration above TVF (true vocal fold)

1

flash penetration to TVF

1

silent penetration to TVF, single event, trace amount

1

silent penetration to TVF, intermittent or chronic

2

flash aspiration, single event

1

flash aspiration, chronic or intermittent

2

aspiration not cleared, single event, not gross

1

aspiration not cleared, intermittent, not cross

2

aspiration not cleared, chronic but not gross

3

aspiration not cleared, gross but not chronic

3

aspiration not cleared, chronic and gross

4

 

safety grade = MAX(safety level for all 3 test boli)

 

Efficiency Grade

Safety Grade

Overall Grade

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

2

2

0

3

3

0

4

3

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

1

3

3

1

4

3

2

0

1

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

3

3

2

4

3

3

0

2

3

1

2

3

2

3

3

3

3

3

4

4

4

0

3

4

1

3

4

2

3

4

3

4

4

4

4

 


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.