Rasmussen et al studied the risk of mortality in patients with acute renal failure based on discriminant analysis of clinical variables. The analysis could identify a subset of patients who were likely to die. The authors are from the Royal North Shore Hospital in Sydney, Australia.
Variables used for stepwise discriminant analysis:
(1) pre-existing heart disease: includes coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease or congestive heart failure
(2) acute heart disease: includes myocardial infarction, myocarditis or infective endocarditis
(3) neoplastic disease: malignant solid or hematologic tumors not considered cured
(4) pre-existing renal disease: baseline serum creatinine concentration > 1.7 mg/dL prior to development of acute renal failure
(5) oliguria: urine output < 400 mL per 24 hours
(6) acute pancreatitis: serum amylase > 1,000 IU/L with appropriate clinical setting
(7) trauma, including severe burns
(8) "other" surgery: any procedure done using general anesthesia other than aortic aneurysm repair or open heart surgery.
(9) CNS damage
(10) respiratory failure
Predictor Variable |
Status |
Function Coefficient |
pre-existing heart disease |
absent |
0 |
|
present |
0.1371 |
acute cardiac illness |
absent |
0 |
|
present |
0.4248 |
neoplastic disease |
absent |
0 |
|
present |
0.3957 |
pre-existing renal disease |
absent |
0 |
|
present |
0.2117 |
oliguria |
absent |
0 |
|
present |
0.3746 |
acute pancreatitis |
absent |
0 |
|
present |
0.3498 |
trauma |
absent |
0 |
|
present |
0.3170 |
"other" surgery |
absent |
0 |
|
present |
0.2086 |
CNS damage |
absent |
0 |
|
present |
0.1977 |
respiratory failure |
absent |
0 |
|
present |
0.1960 |
discriminant score =
= SUM(points for all 10 variables) – 0.5194
where:
• -0.5194 is a constant.
Interpretation:
• minimum score: -0.5194
• maximum score: 2.2216
• The cutoff for the discriminant score was 0.21, with a score > 0.21 indicating a fatal outcome.
Performance with a cutoff of 0.21:
• positive predictive value: 100%
• sensitivity: 58% (32 of 78 nonsurvivors had scores <= 0.21)
Limitations:
• The study was performed in 1985 and survival may have improved since then.
• When a test group was evaluated using the equation, a cutoff of 0.46 was needed to give a 100% positive predictive value, with a sensitivity of 26%.
Specialty: Nephrology, Clinical Laboratory