Ban et al reported scores for predicting the difficulty of a laparoscopic liver resection. The authors are from Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Toho University, Iwate Medical University and Keio University.
Patient selection: candidate for laparoscopic resection of a tumor mass, Child-Pugh grade A or B
Parameters:
(1) extent of liver resection
(2) tumor location by hepatic segment (from 2 to 8)
(3) tumor size in cm
(4) proximity to the main or secondary branches of Glisson's tree to the major hepatic vein or inferior vena cava
(5) Child-Pugh score (as a measure of liver function)
Liver Resection |
Procedure |
Hr0 |
partial |
HrS |
segmentectomy |
Hr-LLS |
left lateral sectionectomy |
Hr1 |
sectionectomy except for left lateral |
Hr2 |
bisectionectomy |
Hr3 |
trisectionectomy |
Parameter |
Finding |
Points for Difficulty Index |
Points for Score |
extent of liver resection |
Hr0 |
-3.687 |
0 |
|
-2.228 |
2 |
|
|
Hr-S |
-0.633 |
3 |
|
Hr-1,2,3 |
0 |
4 |
tumor location |
segment S2 |
0 |
2 |
|
S3 |
0 |
1 |
|
S4 |
0.575 |
3 |
|
S5 |
0.575 |
3 |
|
S6 |
0 |
2 |
|
S7 |
2.145 |
5 |
|
S8 |
2.145 |
5 |
tumor size |
< 3 cm |
0.148 * (size) |
0 |
|
>= 3 cm |
0.148 * (size) |
1 |
proximity to major vessel |
no |
0 |
0 |
|
yes |
0.594 |
1 |
Child Pugh |
Child-Pugh A |
0 |
0 |
|
Child Pugh B |
1.223 |
1 |
difficulty index =
= 6.123 + SUM(difficulty index points)
total score =
= SUM(points for all of the parameters)
Interpretation:
• minimum score: 1
• maximum score: 12
• The higher the results the greater the difficulty of the procedure.
Specialty: Hematology Oncology