web analytics

Description

Taal et al listed criteria for distinguishing true from pseudo progression following therapy of a malignant glioma. Pseudoprogression represents degeneration secondary to therapy, while true progression is associated with a grim prognosis. The authors are from the Erasmus Medical Center, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center in Rotterdam and the University Medical Center Utrecht.


 

Patient selection: malignant glioma treated with chemoradiation

 

Progression was defined as

(1) >= 25% increase in size on MRI scan at 4 weeks after treatment

(2) on stable or higher dose of dexamethasone

(3) with or without neurologic deterioration

 

where:

• The size was based on the area of contrast enhancement.

 

True progression:

(1) additional disease progression (clinical and radiological) within the following 6 months

 

Pseudoprogression - one of the following:

(1) >= 50% decrease in the size of the enhancing lesion AND neurologically stable AND on a stable or decreasing dose of dexamethasone

(2) clinically and radiologically stable AND on a stable or decreasing dose of dexamethasone AND no or adjuvant chemotherapy doses (= no additional disease progression)

 

where:

• A patient who is radiologically "stable" implies no significant change in size. It would seem then that pseudoprogression is anyone who is not true progression.

 

There will be patients who fit into neither group (those receiving an increased dose of dexamethasone, those receiving additional treatment cycles).

 


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.