Description

Ridolfi et al developed criteria for the diagnosis of medullary carcinoma of the breast. Medullary carcinoma tends to be overdiagnosed if criteria are not observed.


 

Criteria for medullary carcinoma - all of the following:

(1) syncytial growth pattern in > 75% of the tumor area

(2) margin completely circumscribed and pushing (noninfiltrative)

(3) moderate to marked mononuclear cell infiltrate of the tumor

(4) nuclei Grade 2 or 3 (moderate to severe pleomorphism)

(5) absence of intraductal growth

(6) absence of microglandular differentiation

 

where:

• Syncytial growth pattern consists of broad, interanastomosing sheets of tumor cells with indistinct cell borders.

 

Atypical medullary carcinomas were diagnosed with both of the following:

(1) syncytial growth pattern in > 75% of the tumor area

(2) 1 or 2 of the following:

(2a) infiltrative margins

(2b) sparse or only peripheral mononuclear cell infiltrate

(2c) Grade 1 nuclei (mild pleomorphism)

(2d) presence of microglandular differentiation

(2e) intraductal carcinoma

 

Nonmedullary carcinoma was diagnosed with one or both of the following:

(1) syncytial growth <= 75% of the tumor area

(2) 3 or more of the features listed for atypical medullary carcinomas

 

Jensen et al found that medullary carcinoma was associated with an excellent prognosis, while atypical or nonmedullary carcinomas had similar outcomes.

 


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.