Description

Gal et al listed criteria for the diagnosis of fibrohistiocytic lesions arising in the lungs. These can help distinguish benign from malignant lesions and can help guide patient management. The authors are from the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) and Emory University.


 

Selection: pulmonary lesions with a storiform or fascicular growth pattern. It is essential to exclude a metastatic focus, since the lungs are a common site of metastases from sarcomas.

Histologic Feature

Inflammatory Pseudotumor, Fibrohistiocytic Type

Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma, Storiform-Pleomorphic Type

fibrohistiocytic proliferation

bland with xanthoma cells

atypical with increased nuclear hyperchromasia

nuclear pleomorphism

none to mild

moderate to marked

giant cells

Touton

bizarre

mitotic rate in 50 high power fields (HPF)

< 3 per 50 HPF

>= 3 per 50 HPF

atypical mitoses

absent

present

tumor necrosis

absent to rare

present

vascular invasion

absent

present

metastases

absent

present

 

where:

• Xanthoma cells are lipid-containing histiocytic cells.

• A microscopic high power field uses an objective lens of 40x ("high dry").

 

An inflammatory pseudotumor should have all of the listed features. It contains a mixture of lymphocytes, plasma cells and/or eosinophils together with the xanthoma cells and Touton giant cells.

 

According to Table 2 (page 1820) the diagnosis of malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) requires >= 4 of the criteria.

 

Any tumor not meeting the criteria for inflammatory pseudotumor or MFH were classified as "borderline tumor". I personally would think that these could be called "probably malignant" if either:

(1) metastases are present

(2) 2 or more of the following are present (mitotic rate >= 3 per 50 HPF, tumor necrosis, vascular invasion, marked nuclear pleomorphism)

 


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.