Description

The methodologic quality of a clinical study or trial can be evaluated by examining its design and implementation. A score based on the key parameters can be used to evaluate the study and to compare it with other similar studies.


 

Parameters:

(1) randomization

(2) blinding

(3) analysis

(4) patient selection

(5) comparability of groups at baseline

(6) extent of follow-up

(7) description of treatment protocol

(8) co-interventions

(9) description of outcomes

Parameter

Finding

Points

randomization

not concealed or not sure

1

 

concealed randomization

2

blinding

not blinded

0

 

adjudicators blinded

2

analysis

other

0

 

intention to treat

2

patient selection

selected patients or unable to tell

0

 

consecutive eligible patients

1

comparability of groups at baseline

no or not sure

0

 

yes

1

extent of follow-up

< 100%

0

 

100%

1

treatment protocol

poorly described

0

 

reproducibly described

1

co-interventions (extent to which interventions applied equally across groups)

not described

0

 

described but not equal or not sure

1

 

well described and all equal

2

outcomes

not described

0

 

partially described

1

 

objectively defined

2

 

Interpretation:

• minimum score: 0

• maximum score: 14

• The higher the score, the higher the quality in the study design and implementation.

 


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.