Description

When an orthopedic prosthesis fails it is important to identify infection as the cause, since revision without control of infection will result in future failure. Identification of neutrophils in periprosthetic soft tissue biopsied at the time of the revision can be used in combination with the clinical appearance to determine the best management strategy.


 

Procedure:

(1) Submit at least 2 samplings of soft tissue for frozen section.

(2) Evaluate the area with the maximum number of neutrophils (excluding areas as listed below).

(3) Count neutrophils in at least 5 high powered fields (40x objective lens).

 

Neutrophils which do not indicate underlying infection and which should not be counted:

(1) in surface fibrin

(2) perivascular (perioperative)

 

NOTE: There are 2 ways to interpret the method:

(1) Count the number of high powered fields with >= 5 neutrophils.

(2) Count at least 5 high powered fields and calculate the average number of neutrophils per high powered field.

 

Interpretation:

• minimum number of neutrophils per high power field: 0

• maximum number: very high

 

Neutrophils per High Power Field

Predictive Value for Infection

< 5

negative predictive value 98%

5 – 9

positive predictive value 70%

>= 10

positive predictive value 89%

from Lester page 41

 

False negatives:

(1) tissue selection by surgeon

(2) sampling error in selecting tissue for frozen section

(3) failure to identify the appropriate site on frozen section

 


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.