Description

Baker developed a satisfaction questionnaire for patients following a general practice consultation. This can help identify areas of patient-perceived strengths and weaknesses in a general practice. The author is from the University of Bristol.


 

Domains - in 18 statements:

(1) general satisfaction (3)

(2) professional care (7)

(3) depth of relationship (5)

(4) perceived time (3)

 

Responses:

• positively directed (agree good): 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15

• negatively directed (disagree good): 5, 7, 8, 11, 16, 17, 18

Response

Positive

Negative

strongly agree

5

1

agree

4

2

neither agree nor disagree

3

3

disagree

2

4

strongly disagree

1

5

 

general satisfaction: 1, 7 and 17

professional care: 2, 3, 6, 9, 10, 12, 13

depth of relationship: 4, 8, 14, 15, 18

perceived time: 5, 11, 16

 

total score =

= SUM(points for all 18 questions)

 

Interpretation:

• minimum total score: 18

• maximum total score: 90

• The higher the score, the greater the level of satisfaction.

 

Subscores

Minimum

Maximum

general satisfaction

3

15

professional care

7

35

depth of relationship

5

25

perceived time

3

15

 

percent maximal satisfaction =

= ((total score) – 18) / 72 * 100%

 

Performance:

• The instrument was found reliable under the study conditions.

• Cronbach's alpha for the entire instrument was 0.91 (professional care 0.87, depth of relationship 0.83, perceived time 0.82, general satisfaction 0.67).

 


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.