Stephenson et al developed a classification and regression tree (CART) model for predicting 4-year progression free survival following radiation therapy in a male with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. This can help identify a patient who may benefit from more aggressive or a novel therapy. The authors are from Cleveland Clinic, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic and multiple other cancer centers in the United States and Canada.
Patient selection: Gleason scores 4 to 10
Parameters:
(1) PSA prior to radiation therapy in ng/mL
(2) Gleason score in the prostatectomy specimen, from 4 to 10
(3) surgical margin at the time of radical prostatectomy
(4) PSA doubling time in months
PSA pre-RT in ng/mL |
Gleason Score |
Surgical Margin |
PSA doubling time |
Endpoint |
<= 2 |
4-7 |
positive |
> 10 |
A |
<= 2 |
4-7 |
positive |
<= 10 |
B |
<= 2 |
4-7 |
negative |
> 10 |
C |
<= 2 |
4-7 |
negative |
<= 10 |
D |
<= 2 |
8-10 |
positive |
> 10 |
E |
<= 2 |
8-10 |
positive |
<= 10 |
F |
<= 2 |
8-10 |
negative |
NA |
G |
> 2 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
H |
Endpoint |
Percent with 4 Year Progression Free Survival |
A |
69% |
B |
57% |
C |
61% |
D |
48% |
E |
50% |
F |
30% |
G |
18% |
H |
19% |
where:
• A patient with a positive surgical margin may show a better progression-free survival than someone with a negative margin. The latter is more likely to present with recurrent disease in a lymph node or distant site.
Specialty: Hematology Oncology, Surgery, general, Urology