web analytics

Description

Seve et al reported prognostic factors for a patient with a carcinoma of unknown primary site. These can help identify a patient who may benefit from more aggressive management. The authors are from Hospices Civils de Lyon (Lyon, France), University of Alberta (Edmonton), Centre Leon Berard (Lyon) and Claude Bernard University (Lyon).


 

Parameters:

(1) WHO (ECOG) performance scale

(2) comorbidity (as measured with the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27)

(3) liver metastases

(4) serum LDH

(5) absolute lymphocyte count

(6) serum albumin

 

Parameter

Finding

Points

performance scale

0 or 1

0

 

2, 3 or 4

1

comorbidity

none, mild or moderate

0

 

severe

1

liver metastases

absent

0

 

present

1

serum LDH

normal

0

 

elevated (> ULN)

1

absolute lymphocyte count

>= 700 per µL

0

 

< 700 per µL (lymphopenia)

1

serum albumin

normal

0

 

decreased (< LLN)

1

 

where:

• ULN = upper limit of normal; LLN = lower limit of normal

 

total score =

= SUM(points for all 6 parameters)

 

Interpretation:

• minimum score: 0

• maximum score: 6

• The higher the score the worse the prognosis.

 

The authors also proposed a simple risk stratification system based on serum albumin and liver metastases.

 

Serum Albumin

Liver Metastases

Risk Group

Median Survival

normal

none

good

371 days

low

none

poor

103 days

normal

present

poor

103 days

low

present

poor

103 days

 


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.