Description

Hukkelhoven et al developed models for predicting outcome following moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. The scores can help identify patients who may require more aggressive management using findings identified on hospital admission. The authors are from Erasmus Medical College in Rotterdam, University of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, University of Edinburgh, and University of California in San Diego.

 


Patient selection: age >= 15 years

 

Unfavorable outcomes at 6 months post-injury:

(1) death

(2) vegetative state

(3) severe disability on Glasgow Outcome Scale

 

Parameters based on admission findings:

(1) age

(2) motor score

(3) papillary reactivity

(4) hypoxia

(5) hypotension

(6) CT classification

(7) traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage

 

Parameter

Finding

Score 1

Score 2

age in years

15 - 39

0

0

 

40 - 54

1

1

 

55 - 64

2

2

 

>= 65

3

3

motor score

localizes or obeys

0

0

 

withdraws

1

1

 

abnormal flexion

2

2

 

extensor

3

3

 

none

3

3

papillary reactivity

both react

0

0

 

1 reacts

1

1

 

0 react

2

2

hypoxia

PaO2 >= 60 mm Hg

0

0

 

PaO2 < 60 mm Hg

1

1

hypotension

systolic >= 90 mm Hg

0

0

 

systolic < 90 mm Hg

2

1

CT classification

Class I (no visible pathology)

0

0

 

Class II (midline shift 1-5 mm)

0

0

 

Class III (cisterns absent or compressed with midline shift 1-5 mm)

2

1

 

Class IV (midline shift > 5 mm)

4

1

 

Class V (any lesion surgically evacuated)

2

1

 

Class VI (high or mixed density lesion > 25 mm not surgically evacuated)

2

1

traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage

absent

0

0

 

present

2

1

 

where:

• Details of the complete prognostic models are given in the Appendix on page 1037 (Hukkelhoven, J Neurotrauma, 2005).

• The CT classification is based on that of Marshall et al (1991)

 

score 1 for predicting 6 month mortality =

= SUM(points for all 7 parameters in score 1 column)

 

score 2 for predicting unfavorable outcome at 6 months =

= SUM(points for all 7 parameters in score 2 column)

 

Interpretation:

• minimum scores: 0

• maximum score 1 (mortality): 17

• maximum score 2 (unfavorable outcome): 12

• The higher the scores the worse the outcome.

 

Score 2

Outcome

Risk of Unfavorable Outcome

Mean Mortality Rate

0 - 2

good

0 - 20%

7%

3

relatively good

21 - 40%

15%

4 - 5

intermediate

41 - 60%

30%

6 - 7

poor

61 - 80%

47%

8 - 12

very poor

81 - 100%

68%

 

 

Total Score

Score 1 (Probability of Mortality)

Score 2 (Probability of an Unfavorable Outcome)

0

3%

8%

1

5%

13%

2

8%

22%

3

10%

33%

4

14%

46%

5

19%

60%

6

26%

73%

7

33%

83%

8

42%

91%

9

52%

95%

10

62%

97%

11

71%

99%

12

78%

100%

13

85%

NA

14

89%

NA

15

95%

NA

16

98%

NA

from Figure 2, page 1034, Hukkelhoven et al, J Neurotrauma (2005)

 

Performance:

• The score used large number of patients and a large number of predictors. It underwent internal and external validation.


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.