Description

Petterson et al developed a longitudinal rating scale for the manic state. It can be used to monitor the manic patient over time and evaluate response to therapeutic interventions. It was developed at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden.


Parts:

(1) ratings of individual features

(2) global ratings

 

Individual Feature Rating

 

Parameters:

(1) motor activity: This item concerns an increase in general mobility as can be observed in mimics, gestures, gait and other intentional movements. Consideration is given to quantity as well as to rate of movements.

(2) pressure of speech: This items concerns a quantitative evaluation of the patient's verbal activity as observed during the interview.

(3) flight of ideas: This item is related to flow of associations as can be inferred from the patient's talk during the interview.

(4) noisiness: This item concerns the level of noise the patient induces as can be noticed during the interview.

(5) aggressiveness: This item rates aggressiveness in terms of the patient's verbal and behavioral expressions. It is rated with regard to intensity and frequency.

(6) orientation

(7) elevated mood: This item is related to the level of mood the patient expresses in his/her mimics, selection of conversation subjects and personal view of his/her mood.

 

 

Parameter

Finding

Points

motor activity

Quiet or slow movements. Few gestures. Ordinary or slightly prolonged latency at the initiation of activity.

1

 

Ordinarily changing rate and amount of movements. Only short periods of quiescence occur

2

 

Vivid mimics and gait. Gestures and movements are abundant without being exaggerated or especially remarkable.

3

 

Exaggerated, extensive and/or rapid movements occur repeatedly. Gesticulation is conspicuous. The patient leaves his/her chair on single occasions during the interview.

4

 

Continuous motor activity. The patient cannot be persuaded to remain in a quiet sitting or recumbent position.

5

pressure of speech

Gives laconic answers. Expresses few sentences spontaneously.

1

 

Gives adequate answers without being word-rich. Talks without hindrance.

2

 

Expresses spontaneously longer sentences. Gives word-rich answers. Rapid speech.

3

 

Very talkative. Utters spontaneously detailed, word-rich statements, interrupts the interviewer on single occasions.

4

 

Directs the conversation completely. It is impossible to cutoff the patient's talk. The patient talks uninterruptedly without paying attention to stimuli from the interviewer.

5

flight of ideas

The patient's talk is coherent and the connection between the sentences is adequate. Few associations.

1

 

Free, lively associations with a tendency towards deviation from the subject.

2

 

Rapid flow of associations with single occurrence of unusual associations as induced by sound or other stimuli.

3

 

Associations are rich and rapid and there is an abundance of associations induced by visual and auditory stimuli during the interview.

4

 

The conversation often deviates with regard to the subject, and the patient has great difficulty in continuing a logical conversation due to new associations.

5

noisiness

The patient talks with a low or modulated voice level.

1

 

Speaks clearly and on single occasions loudly. Regulates his/her noise level according to his/her environment.

2

 

Speaks loudly all the time but cannot be regarded as disturbing.

3

 

The level of noise the patient makes can be heard at some distance. The patient does not regulate the level of noise with regard to his/her environment. The amount of noise the patient induces is disturbing.

4

 

The patient shouts and roars more or les constantly and is very disturbing.

5

aggressiveness

No noticeable signs of aggressiveness.

1

 

On provocation the patient is slightly irritable.

2

 

On single occasions aggressive statements in relation to events occurring outside the interview. The conversation during the interview occurs calmly for long periods.

3

 

Verbal aggressiveness repeatedly without provocation. Quarrels, leaves the chair, but can be calmed.

4

 

Threatening, destructive acts, physical violence during the interview.

5

orientation

Clear sensorium. Adequate orientation.

1

 

Slight or infrequent occurrence of clouded sensorium.

2

 

Obvious disorientation during most of the interview.

3

elevated mood

A neutral mood. Modulated changes between higher and lower mood with regard to the subject of conversation.

1

 

The patient has an optimistic, self-confident attitude which appears to be adequate in relation to his/her situation.

2

 

The patient has an optimistic, happy or self-confident attitude without regard to the subject of speech. The mood is elevated as can be noticed from the selection of subjects for conversation and facial expression and gesture.

3

 

Markedly elevated mood or exaggerated self-confidence without relation to subject of conversation. Intermittently an intense feeling of well-being.

4

 

A continuous feeling of extreme well-being or marked emotional exaltation. Maximal self-confidence.

5

 

Global Ratings

 

Parameter

Finding

Points

manic state

no signs of hypomanic or manic state

1

 

possibly hypomanic, optimistic attitude

2

 

hypomanic

3

 

manic behavior

4

 

markedly manic behavior

5

change in manic state since previous rating

marked deterioration

1

 

slight deterioration

2

 

unchanged

3

 

slight improvement

4

 

marked improvement

5

 

where:

• The points assigned for the global rating of change in state seems reversed from what I would expect.

 

total score for individual features =

= SUM(points for individual features)

 

Interpretation:

• minimum score for individual features: 7

• maximal score for individual features: 33

• The higher the score for individual features, the more manic the clinical picture.

• Effective drug treatment is associated with (1) a decrease in the score for individual features, (2) a decrease in the global rating for manic state, and (3) an increase in the global rating for change from previous ratings.


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.