Description

Silver et al proposed a clinical rule to identify patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF >= 40%) after an acute myocardial infarction. These patients do not require additional testing to determine if the ejection fraction is adequate. The authors are from the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.


Questions for a patient with an acute myocardial infarction (MI):

(1) Does the patient have a history of CHF, or CHF with the index MI?

(2) Is the ECG uninterpretable based because of left bundle branch block (LBBB), pacing or left ventricular hypertrophy with strain?

(3) Is an old Q wave present, or a Q wave outside the region of ischemia?

(4) Is the MI anterior with new Q waves or ST segment elevations?

 

Interpretation:

• If the answers to all of the questions is "No", then the left ventricular ejection fraction is >= 40%.

• If the answers to one or more of the questions is "Yes", then additional testing (echocardiography or ventriculography) must be done to determine the LVEF.

 

Performance:

• The positive predictive value in the derivation and validation patient sets was > 0.98.

• About 40% of the patients in the original study were identified as having preserved LVEF and would not have required additional testing.

 

Validation by others:

• Tobin et al evaluated the clinical prediction rule in the setting of a community hospital associated with the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. They found the positive predictive value to be 0.86. Addition of a fifth question (Does the patient have a non-Q-wave anterior MI?) increased the PPV to 0.91 in their study.


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.