Janardhan et al evaluated risk factors for adverse outcomes after interventions for incidental intracranial aneurysm. These can help advise patients of the risks associated with a procedure. The authors are from Boston, Harvard and Cornell Universities.
Morbidity was defined as development of a new neurological deficit with either a modified Rankin scale >= 3 or a Mini-Mental Status Examination < 24.
Risk factors for post-procedural morbidity in multivariate analysis:
(1) diameter of the aneurysm >= 13 mm
(2) location in the posterior distribution
Risk Factor |
Odds Ratio |
95% CI |
p value |
< 13 mm vs >= 13 mm |
0.29 |
0.09 – 0.96 |
0.041 |
anterior vs posterior distribution |
0.24 |
0.06 – 0.95 |
0.042 |
where 1/0.29 = 3.45 and 1/0.24 = 4.17
Finding |
Percent with Early Morbidity |
Percent with Late Morbidity |
diameter < 13 mm |
10.6% |
4.9% |
diameter >= 13 |
27.3% |
13.6% |
anterior circulation |
11.5% |
4.4% |
posterior circulation |
33.3% |
25% |
from Table 2
Factors not found statistically significant for poor outcome but which may affect the decision to treat include:
(1) advanced age (age by itself would not preclude a procedure in a healthy elder with an accessible aneurysm)
(2) presence of severe comorbid conditions
Additional features of the aneurysm that may make a procedure more difficult:
(1) broad neck (> 4 mm)
(2) calcified neck
The presence of multiple incidental aneurysms may be associated with a high morbidity but was not found statistically significant (p = 0.30) in the current study (Table 2).
Specialty: Neurology
ICD-10: ,