Description

Spengler et al developed an Objective Evaluation System for evaluating patients with a possible herniated lumbar disc. This can help to identify a patient prior to surgery who will benefit from lumbar discectomy. The authors are from the University of Washington in Seattle and the Seattle Veterans Administration Hospital.


 

Parameters:

(1) neurological signs

(2) sciatic tension signs

(3) personality factors (based on MMPI)

(4) imaging studies (lumbar myelography, CT or MRI)

 

Neurological Signs

Findings

Points

weakness consistent with level of lesion

with positive EMG

25

 

with negative EMG

10

 

none

0

atrophy (more than 2 cm)

absent

0

 

present

10

reflexes

absent or asymmetrical, age <= 50 years, positive EMG

25

 

absent or asymmetrical, age <= 50 years, negative EMG

20

 

absent or asymmetrical, age > 50, positive EMG

25

 

absent or asymmetrical, age > 50, negative EMG

10

 

normal

0

no clinical signs

EMG positive

15

 

EMG negative

0

 

where:

• Atrophy would be measured by limb circumference, reflecting muscle mass.

 

Sciatic Tension

Points

crossed straight leg raising test positive

20

pelvic tilt

15

dysrhythmia of lumbar paraspinal muscles when back is in motion

15

ipsilateral straight leg raising test positive

5

all absent

0

 

where:

• A positive crossed straight leg raising test involves pain in the asymptomatic side when the leg on the asymptomatic side is raised..

 

Personality Factors

Points

normal

25

depression

25

impulsive or schizophrenic

10

hypochondriasis

10

hysteria (above 1 SD but less than 2 SD above mean)

10

hysteria (>= mean + 2 SD)

0

conversion reaction

0

 

 

Imaging Studies

Points

normal

0

positive but does not match clinical findings

0

equivocal nerve root asymmetry

10

positive and matches clinical findings

25

 

objective evaluation score =

= MIN(25, total for neurological signs) + MIN(25, total for sciatic tension signs) + MIN(25, total for personality factors) + MIN(25, imaging studies)

 

Interpretation:

• minimum score: 0

• maximum score: 100

• The higher the score the more likely that the patient will have a good result following discectomy.

 


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.