Description

Ben-David et al reported a minimally invasive treatment algorithm to manage a patient with an esophageal perforation. An esophageal perforation can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality if not treated appropriately. The authors are from the University of Florida at Gainseville and Roswell Park Cancer Center in Buffalo.


 

Patient selection: esophageal perforation (iatrogenic, spontaneous, other)

 

Diagnosis: CT of chest and abdomen with water-soluble contrast

 

Most perforations occur in the distal esophagus (90%).

 

Parameters:

(1) location of perforation

(2) contained vs uncontained

(3) number of hours since event

Location

Containment

Number of Hours

Intervention

esophagus

yes

NA

1

esophagus

no

NA

2

abdomen

NA

< 24 hours

3

abdomen

NA

>= 24 hours

4

 

Intervention 1:

(1) nil per os (NPO)

(2) intravenous antibiotics

(3) chest drainage if needed

 

Intervention 2:

(1) placement of esophageal stent

(2) drainage if needed (laparoscopic or thoracoscopic)

(3) laparoscopic feeding tube (gastrostomy, jejunostomy)

 

Intervention 3:

(1) placement of esophageal stent

(2) minimally invasive repair with or without gastric wrap

(3) laparoscopic jejunostomy feeding tube

 

Intervention 4:

(1) placement of esophageal stent

(2) laparoscopic drainage

(3) laparoscopic jejunostomy feeding tube

 

One third of patients had prolonged intubation and pneumonia.

 


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.