Description

The Edmonton Staging System can be used to evaluate a patient with cancer-related pain. This can identify patients who may require greater efforts to achieve pain control or who may have poor pain control despite all interventions. The authors are from Edmonton in Alberta, Canada.


 

Parameters:

(1) mechanism of pain (A)

(2) pain characteristics (B)

(3) previous opioid exposure (C)

(4) cognitive function (D)

(5) psychological distress (E)

(6) tolerance to opioid (F)

(7) past history for alcohol or drug addiction (G)

 

Parameter

Finding

Designation

mechanism of pain

visceral pain

A1

 

bone or soft tissue pain

A2

 

neuropathic pain

A3

 

mixed neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain

A4

 

unknown

A5

pain characteristics

nonincidental pain

B1

 

incidental pain

B2

previous opioid exposure

less than 60 mg or equivalent of oral morphine per day

C1

 

60 – 300 mg or equivalent of oral morphine per day

C2

 

> 300 mg or equivalent of oral morphine per day

C3

cognitive function

normal cognitive function

D1

 

impaired cognitive function

D2

psychological distress

without major psychological distress

E1

 

with major psychological distress

E2

tolerance

increase of < 5% of initial dose per day

F1

 

increase >= 5% of initial dose per day

F2

past history

negative history for alcoholism or drug addiction

G1

 

positive history of alcoholism or drug addiction

G2

 

where:

• Visceral pain = pain due to visceral involvement by tumor. It is usually not well-localized. It may be described as dull, aching or cramping.

• Bone or soft tissue pain = pain affecting a bone or soft tissue area, that is usually well localized and which is often described as aching.

• Neuropathic pain = pain located in a the region where a nerve or nerve root has been damaged. It may be associated with motor and/or sensory deficits, autonomic changes, paresthesias or paroxysmal episodes of pain.

• Mixed pain = presence of both neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain.

• Unknown pain = mechanism of pain unknown after complete clinical history, physical examination and imaging studies.

 

After initial development, items C and D were eliminated from staging for prognosis since they did not show independent correlation (p values 0.05 and 0.72 respectively, vs < 0.01 for the other parameters).

 

Stages of pain, as determined by prognosis for pain control:

(1) Stage 1: good prognosis

(2) Stage 2: poor prognosis

 

Poor prognosis if any of the following:

(1) A3, A3, or A5

(2) B2

(3) E2

(4) F2

(5) G2

 

If not poor prognosis, then considered good prognosis, with good prospects for cancer control.

 

Many patients (> 50%) in the "poor" prognostic group can still achieve good pain control, but this may require greater effort or clinical expertise.

 


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.