Description

In a laboratory with a large volume of testing, verification of results upon completion of testing can slow down the turnaround time for a laboratory. One approach to reduce this time is rule-based autoverification. This can work provided it is implemented properly.


 

One factor affecting how well autoverification works is the proportion of abnormal values. Autoverification works best when:

(1) the number of abnormal values is low.

(2) the analytical method and instrumentation are reliable.

 

A result may be autoverified if it meets a series of rules:

(1) the quality control is within range

(2) the result is within the normal reference range

(3) the result passes delta check

 

A result should not be autoverified if:

(1) the result is a critical value (this would fail item 2 above)

(2) the result is an absurd value (this would fail item 2 above)

(3) the result is used to reflex other tests (unlikely for a normal value)

 

If the result does not meet the criteria for autoverification, then it is reviewed by the technologist who may decide to:

(1) release the result

(2) repeat testing on the same specimen

(3) repeat testing on a new specimen

(4) contact a supervisor or clinician

 

Autoverification needs to undergo validation, periodic review and troubleshooting.

 


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.