Description

Ruta et al all used a questionnaire to measure outcome in patients with low back pain. This can be used for initial evaluation of the patient and to monitor the effectiveness of any interventions. The authors are from the University of Aberdeen and the Aberdeen Royal Infirmary in Scotland.


 

The instrument consists of 19 questions

 

where:

• Point assignments is discussed on page 1889, first column.

• Some point assignments may need review. For example, pain in the foot or ankle without pain higher up strikes me as unusual to be due to back pain.

• The point assignment for actions that relieve the pain is unclear to me. According to the text, it could be scored as +1 for each activity. But it would seem that the pain is worse if no activity relieves the pain. So I scored it as (4 – (number of actions relieving the pain)).

• Many scores of pain relief distinguish between different types of "painkillers".

 

total number of points =

= SUM(points for all questions answered)

 

back pain severity score =

= (SUM(points for all questions answered) / SUM(maximum points for questions answered)) * 100

 

Interpretation:

• minimum back pain severity scale: 0

• maximum back pain severity scale: 100

• The higher the score, the greater the severity of the back pain.

 

Performance:

• The authors found the instrument valid and reliable.

• It was compared to the Oswestry, Waddell and Greenough indices.

• It correlated with the SF-36 as a general measure of health status. It was able to detect significant changes in patients and was more responsive than the SF-36.

• It shows good internal consistency and test-retest reliability.

• The instrument shows construct validity.

 


To read more or access our algorithms and calculators, please log in or register.